So, what part of, "I have fifteen balls in my ass and I need more, officer," didn't you understand, officer?
I have made a few analogies for the way the mind works over the years. Here are a few:
The mind is like a pile of sand where each grain is an experience that falls on top to settle in the pile according to abelien sandpile model mechanics. That means each grain falls like a Plinko peg through multiple juncture points, and the order they fall in doesn't entirely matter; if Grain 1 can fall in Position A or B, then if Grain 2 takes the other Position, this leads to the same outcome, as each neuron is calculating its own pile.
Now, I like this analogy because is allows me to simply describe how we develop a fixed, unmoving core and by stepping out of your comfort zone, you give your piles impactful experiences that move this core. But I can complexify this analogy to shift from "pile" to "planetoid" with sand falling from multiple planes onto several features (pit, depression, hill, pyramid, etc) that are unique to each of our tabula rasa planetoids to make us more predisposed to ways of being, but these can be as helpful or harmful as you make them and maladaptive features and resulting patterns built from them can be corrected through spiritual work.
Now, I can this to another level and get even more precise and say it's not a planetoid but the opposite with radial gravity and these are really strings and how they get where they are is how we set our intention in each moment, which changes the "outer" portion of where these strings are stored, y'know, where the gravity is pushing them, and this is where I'm still trying to come up with meaningful ways to designate and communicate some additional features I perceive in this model.
Then we move into thinking of categorical matrices. Y'know, the objective reality is like a detailed tapestry with intricate patterns on it, but we don't ever contact that but rather we draw straight lines on the glass pane between us and the tapestry, from one edge of the glass or existing line to the other terminus. This allows us each to develop a highly intricate overlay for *part* of the tapestry; y'know, a marine infantryman will encapsulate their world around different features they found important in the tapestry than a baby-sitter.
And this is where we start getting into the ish I half-assed this morning about completing Gödel's incompleteness theorems using polyplexic axiomatic systems to encompass multiple features of the tapestry at opposing times; cognitive dissonance! But it goes beyond this because each of us are an amalgam of several "apples," where the "apple tree" is the objective reality. These apples are magick and you can only carry a certain number at a time, and if you take another, the most similar apple returns to the tree, out of our reach. The idea of growing and learning and developing is getting the perfect batch of apples, based on the ones you happened to get in your basket to begin with. But, how does one get the perfect batch of apples? Triangulation through deductive reasoning; you gotta put on many hats to learn what are the best apples for your basket, but everyone knows what that means.
...I'm still working on it, but this is something. I want to mention that trick four piece puzzle I had when I was a kid. You put three together, however you wanted, but no matter what, the fourth wouldn't go in. If you could möbiate part of that system, you could play with the entanglements through skillful trial and error to gain intuitive insight in how to have contradictions in our "self" that all cancel each other out to thus "be without sin" as those Jebus and Boobha fellahs and many more you haven't heard of, cuz have you seen this Earth shit? If you could transcend physicality and go to futaclub island, most people go there or their equivalency of paradise. It takes a special someone to do the whole bodhisattabeñero or however it's spelled. So, you're welcome.
The mind is like a pile of sand where each grain is an experience that falls on top to settle in the pile according to abelien sandpile model mechanics. That means each grain falls like a Plinko peg through multiple juncture points, and the order they fall in doesn't entirely matter; if Grain 1 can fall in Position A or B, then if Grain 2 takes the other Position, this leads to the same outcome, as each neuron is calculating its own pile.
Now, I like this analogy because is allows me to simply describe how we develop a fixed, unmoving core and by stepping out of your comfort zone, you give your piles impactful experiences that move this core. But I can complexify this analogy to shift from "pile" to "planetoid" with sand falling from multiple planes onto several features (pit, depression, hill, pyramid, etc) that are unique to each of our tabula rasa planetoids to make us more predisposed to ways of being, but these can be as helpful or harmful as you make them and maladaptive features and resulting patterns built from them can be corrected through spiritual work.
Now, I can this to another level and get even more precise and say it's not a planetoid but the opposite with radial gravity and these are really strings and how they get where they are is how we set our intention in each moment, which changes the "outer" portion of where these strings are stored, y'know, where the gravity is pushing them, and this is where I'm still trying to come up with meaningful ways to designate and communicate some additional features I perceive in this model.
Then we move into thinking of categorical matrices. Y'know, the objective reality is like a detailed tapestry with intricate patterns on it, but we don't ever contact that but rather we draw straight lines on the glass pane between us and the tapestry, from one edge of the glass or existing line to the other terminus. This allows us each to develop a highly intricate overlay for *part* of the tapestry; y'know, a marine infantryman will encapsulate their world around different features they found important in the tapestry than a baby-sitter.
And this is where we start getting into the ish I half-assed this morning about completing Gödel's incompleteness theorems using polyplexic axiomatic systems to encompass multiple features of the tapestry at opposing times; cognitive dissonance! But it goes beyond this because each of us are an amalgam of several "apples," where the "apple tree" is the objective reality. These apples are magick and you can only carry a certain number at a time, and if you take another, the most similar apple returns to the tree, out of our reach. The idea of growing and learning and developing is getting the perfect batch of apples, based on the ones you happened to get in your basket to begin with. But, how does one get the perfect batch of apples? Triangulation through deductive reasoning; you gotta put on many hats to learn what are the best apples for your basket, but everyone knows what that means.
...I'm still working on it, but this is something. I want to mention that trick four piece puzzle I had when I was a kid. You put three together, however you wanted, but no matter what, the fourth wouldn't go in. If you could möbiate part of that system, you could play with the entanglements through skillful trial and error to gain intuitive insight in how to have contradictions in our "self" that all cancel each other out to thus "be without sin" as those Jebus and Boobha fellahs and many more you haven't heard of, cuz have you seen this Earth shit? If you could transcend physicality and go to futaclub island, most people go there or their equivalency of paradise. It takes a special someone to do the whole bodhisattabeñero or however it's spelled. So, you're welcome.