NCD being to credible strikes again...on the topic of distributed SAR satellite constellations
A year ago i said in a NCD comment:
> "ima stay fully non credible here and just claim that the starlink constellation can probably be used engage basically everything because there is no “beyond visual horizon”, **the constellation is probably useable as distributed synthetic aperture in multiple wavelengths.** Its also very usable for guidance telemetry."
[Source ](https://sh.itjust.works/post/28772854/15299100)
Well forward a year and someone apparently done the math on that and it checks out:
[Is Starlink A Secret Radar Constellation? -- Noise in Space YT channel](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jbp3kdJZ1_A)
> "ima stay fully non credible here and just claim that the starlink constellation can probably be used engage basically everything because there is no “beyond visual horizon”, **the constellation is probably useable as distributed synthetic aperture in multiple wavelengths.** Its also very usable for guidance telemetry."
[Source ](https://sh.itjust.works/post/28772854/15299100)
Well forward a year and someone apparently done the math on that and it checks out:
[Is Starlink A Secret Radar Constellation? -- Noise in Space YT channel](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jbp3kdJZ1_A)